Radioshack Represents Remarkable Value Opportunity ($RSH, $BBY)

Sometimes the best investment opportunities are right in front of you and for one reason or another, you fail to take notice. This is the surprising case of how I failed to notice Radioshack’s (NYSE: RSH) remarkable performance for far too long.

I can tell what you are thinking. Radioshack… is that company still around? Who possibly shops there when there is a bigger selection of electronics at Best Buy (NYSE: BBY)? I shared these views for years.  The first retail business I owned was located just a few doors down from a Radioshack location, and it never occurred to me to make big electronics purchases there. I would shop there only when I needed something quickly, like new batteries, or a network cable – small purchases that didn’t justify making a trip out to Best Buy. 

It appears my behaviour isn’t unique, and this provides Radioshack with a big advantage. Consumers are relatively price inelastic when it comes to these small necessity items. When a battery dies, you need a new one, and concerns over the cost of replacing it are usually trumped by convenience. Let’s compare Radioshack’s gross margins relative to Best Buy’s:

Radioshack vs. Best Buy, 1994 - 1Q 2011

Radioshack vs. Best Buy, 1994 - 1Q 2011

Radioshack’s gross margins are significantly higher than Best Buy’s. Best Buy has done quite well riding the growth in personal PCs and other items, generating significant revenue growth. But this growth has been in relatively lower margin items. On the other hand, Radioshack has experienced relatively flat revenue, but maintained exceptionally high gross margins. Their strategies differ, and neither is inherently better (In fact, I think Best Buy is a fantastic value opportunity as well). 

It seems that, while Radioshack lacks the sexiness of a big box retailer with massive revenue growth, it is running an incredibly stable business targeting a particular demographic that isn’t price conscious, in a market with relatively less competition.

Let’s see how the company has behaved as a steward of shareholder wealth.

Radioshack returns, 1994 - 1Q 2011

Radioshack returns, 1994 - 1Q 2011

This chart shows how, for more than a decade, Radioshack’s management has been generating returns, on a variety of metrics, in double digits, from the mid teens all the way up to the high 30s. Pretty impressive! Before you email, the answer is No, I have not included operating leases in the chart here, as there is a considerable number of assumptions implicit in calculating the present value of operating leases – the bulk of which stem from the generally poor disclosures required of companies. This should be changing soon, but in the meantime if you want to know the effect of these, you’ll have to do your own calculations using your own assumptions.

Readers of my multi-part review of Financial Shenanigans will know to check for (at least) two other things. First, let’s check the company’s cash conversion cycle to identify any potential shenanigans related to inventories, aggressive revenue policies and one-time boosts:

Radioshack Cash Conversion Cycle, 1994 - 1Q 2011

Radioshack Cash Conversion Cycle, 1994 - 1Q 2011

Though the company does not enjoy the awesome cash conversion cycle of Dell Inc. (NASDAQ: DELL), and has a significantly longer cycle than Best Buy (See BBY’s chart here), the company has had relatively stable levels over a long time, suggesting a low likelihood of a number of financial shenanigans (you’ll have to read my multi-part review to find out which ones!). This appears to be part of the company’s strategy, focusing on higher margin, slower moving items. As the company expands its online sales, these levels may come down.

The other important thing to note is any potential divergence between the company’s reported Comparable Sales Change and our own calculation of Total Revenues / Average Stores Open. This helps identify when new stores are underperforming, or when management is fiddling with their definition of comparable stores, which is a red flag.

Radioshack Store-level Sales Growth, 1997 - 2010

Radioshack Store-level Sales Growth, 1997 - 2010

From this, we see that my calculated figures of sales growth among company-operated stores has tracked closely with the company’s provided Comparable Store Sales Growth figures. This is a good thing. 

So let’s sum up. Boring company? Check! Stable operations? Check! Conservatively capitalized? Check! Strong returns? Check! I’ll paraphrase Teddy Roosevelt: “Walk softly and carry a big stick.” That’s exactly what Radioshack appears to have done over its history, quietly wracking up fantastic performance while Mr. Market directs its fickle attention elsewhere.

In valuing Radioshack I looked at a variety of scenarios, some bullish, some bearish, and I concluded that, at the current share price ($13.38 as of 7/13), the company has a sizable margin of safety unless making extremely pessimistic assumptions. You can draw your own conclusions about how the future will play out, but I am happy with the odds Mr. Market is providing (the company is trading down ~29% YTD).

Oh – one more thing before we end. The company has been a massive repurchaser of shares over the last decade, returning a significant amount of cash to investors. Not bad!

Radioshack Shares Outstanding, 2000 - 1Q 2011

Radioshack shares outstanding, 2000 - 1Q 2011

 

Author Disclosure: Long RSH

Talk to Frank about Radioshack

Related posts:

  1. Best Buy: A Shareholder Friendly Value Stock (BBY)
  2. Cisco Systems: Colossal Free Cash Flows Create Compelling Opportunity ($CSCO)
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jason-Frey/1334013523 Jason Frey

    FWIW, the CEO who seemed to be responsible for the great performance left the company earlier this year. The stock sank on that news and has never gone north again.

    • Anonymous

      Hi Jason,

      I agree, Julian Day was an awesome CEO, but I believe his #2 (and currnet
      CEO) worked closely with him at two different companies and I am sure was a
      big part of the strategizing and implementation.

      Thanks,

      Frank Voisin

  • Anonymous

    the concern i have w/ radio shack is that its earnings growth is negative.  if I am going to invest, I prefer seeing growth in this category.
    Also, when you say they return a significant amount of cash to investors, do you mean their dividend, which is a fair 2.0%?  Because when they do share buy backs, they aren’t giving any money to investors, just to those selling out of the stock.

    • Anonymous

      Focus on what the market has implied in the price. Negative earnings growth
      is not necessarily bad if the market has implied far more negative earnings
      growth than you expect. Likewise, positive earnings growth is positive in
      itself if the market expects even greater earnings growth. Investment
      opportunities exist due to a mismatch between reality and what the market
      expects.

      When a company does a share buyback, it is returning money to investors
      (beyond those who have sold) because the remaining investors own a greater
      stake in the company. Their claim on the company has increased.

      Thanks,
      Frank Voisin

  • JAC

    I just stepped into an RSH position, thanks for the recommendation. Another interesting call on an overlooked company!

  • Jon

    Ugg, RSH is getting pummeled today…just wait it out or buy some more?

    • frank

      I will wait for their conference call to get a handle on the issues that led to this quarter’s poor performance.

      I am shocked that they committed themselves to halting the share repurchase program. This just seems like a tactical error, since they could easily have left this out and then simply not used the program for a quarter or two. Now with shares down another 30%, it seems it would make a lot of sense to be repurchasing.

  • Jon

    How did the conference call go…any further insight…?