Transocean Releases Internal Investigation Report ($RIG, $BP)

I’ve written about Transocean (NYSE: RIG) several times since the monumental collapse of their share price following the Deepwater Horizon disaster last year. For those following the company, it may interest you to see the results of their internal investigation into what caused and exacerbated that disaster. As expected, they blame BP (NYSE: BP).

The Transocean internal investigation team began its work in the days immediately following the incident. Through an extensive investigation, the team interviewed witnesses, reviewed available information regarding well design and execution, examined well monitoring data that had been transmitted real-time from the rig to BP, consulted industry and technical experts, and evaluated available physical evidence and third-party testing reports.

There are four categories of problems they point to (I’ve edited the following down from their press release):

  • Risk Management and Communication: Evidence indicates that BP failed to properly assess, manage and communicate risk to its contractors.
  • Well Design and Construction: The precipitating cause of the Macondo incident was the failure of the downhole cement to isolate the reservoir, which allowed hydrocarbons to enter the wellbore. Without the failure of the cement barrier, hydrocarbons would not have entered the well or reached the rig. …
  • Risk Assessment and Process Safety: Based on the evidence, the investigation team determined that BP failed to properly require or confirm critical cement tests or conduct adequate risk assessments during various operations at Macondo.
  • Operations:
    • Negative Pressure Test: The results of the critical negative pressure test were misinterpreted.
    • Well Control: By the time actions were taken, hydrocarbons had risen above the blowout preventer and into the riser, resulting in a massive release of gas and other fluids that overwhelmed the mud gas separator system and released high volumes of gas onto the aft deck of the rig. The resulting ignition of this gas cloud was inevitable.
    • Blowout Preventer (BOP): Forensic evidence from independent post-incident testing by Det Norske Veritas (DNV) and evaluation by the Transocean investigation team confirm that the Deepwater Horizon BOP was properly maintained and operated. However, it was overcome by the extreme dynamic flow, the force of which pushed the drill pipe upward, washed or eroded the drill pipe and other rubber and metal elements, and forced the drill pipe to bow within the BOP. This prevented the BOP from completely shearing the drill pipe and sealing the well.

You can read the full report here.

Author Disclosure: Long RIG

Talk to Frank about Transocean

Related posts:

  1. Transocean Update (RIG)
  2. Transocean Update (RIG)
  3. Transocean Ltd: An Event Driven Value Opportunity (RIG)
  4. Annual cost of the Gulf Drilling freeze to the US (RIG, NE, RDC)
  5. Noble Corporation (NE): The Index Becomes the Catalyst
  • http://www.boothlaird.com Kevin Laird

    Thanks for keeping up with this…it is a very hot topic here in Southern Louisiana.  

    • Anonymous

      What’s the popular feeling about who should be blamed? BP or Transocean?

      Frank Voisin

      • http://www.boothlaird.com Kevin Laird

        BP.  No doubt about it.  The only reasons I can think of are:  

        They are the face of the issue.  They are the ones who set up the oil spill fund.  They are the ones who had pictures of their sign cropped to show oil spilled on it.  The sentiment directly related to BP around here is they made more money on jobs because they pushed too hard and cut corners…not sure if any of that is true because I have absolutely no experience in O&G.

        All the lawsuits are said to be against BP which I am not sure if that is totally true.  I got an email the other day from a guy saying he was meeting with some people who are suing BP to help do some business loss related valuations.  The subject of the email was “BP Opportunities”….lol.  

        Many people here work for Transocean in various capacities.  A lot of the roughnecks and roustabouts and laborers work for contractors like Transocean, etc and not for companies like BP.  This means that people are more inclined to be loyal to their employer and their company and blame the other guy or “team”.  Just my thoughts.  

        I think there was even a third company heavily related to the issue.  I cannot even recall their right now without using Google.  But, anyone on the planet can tell you BP was involved.  Even my 4th grade school teacher mother can tell you BP, but I can assure you she doesn’t know Transocean.  Granted she has no affect on either’s stock price as she doesn’t control her pensions investments.

        • Anonymous

          Cameron made the failed blow-out preventer, Halliburton was involved in the
          shoddy well design, and there was a second (much smaller) company that was
          partners with BP in contracting with RIG.

          Thanks for your on-the-ground insight!

          Take care,
          Frank Voisin