Last week I reviewed Sharelock Holmes, the UK’s best fundamental stock screener. This week I took a look at the newest addition to the crowded stock screener market, Screener.co, which exited beta on April 1st (so, unfortunately free access is no longer available).
Wide and Deep Coverage
Screener.co offers global coverage including 40,000+ stocks from 30,000+ companies, as well as the ability to screen on more than 1,000 data points per company. The number of data points is particularly important, as this is my biggest criticism of the other screeners that are available. One nice data point is the “country of operation”, which allows the user to screen out all of the Chinese reverse merger companies that currently fill value screens.
Highly Functional and Accurate
Screener.co has taken a page out of RobotDough’s playbook, allowing for “Plain-English, free-form conditions” which allow the user to build composite criteria and ranking formulas similar to RobotDough. I have found that RobotDough’s results are sometimes inaccurate, but from what I have seen of Screener.co, I have found only accuracy.
Screener.co also offers automated alerts, similar to what Zignals does (Zignals is currently the best for automated alerts, allowing specific stock alerts and screened results alerts) for changes to the screened results:
Fantastic Output
Unlike Sharelock Holmes, Screener.co has put a lot of effort into making the outputs aesthetically pleasing (see screenshot below). Also, Screener.co allows users to export the results to excel – such a simple feature but a wonder why the other companies fail to do this. It is the small touches like this that make me think Screener.co was built by actual investors rather than outsiders trying to take advantage of a perceived business opportunity.
Pricing
Unlike RobotDough, Zignals, Google Finance, etc, Screener.co has decided to charge for its services, and fairly high rates as well. Whether the user will find enough of a benefit from using Screener.co versus its (many) competitors, such that paying these fees, remains to be seen. I doubt it, especially since the additional features that Screener.co offers are easily replicated by its (free) competitors.
Conclusion
While I enjoyed testing this service and I am excited to see what the company does in the future to stay relevant as its competitors introduce some of these features, I don’t find enough value to justify the pricing right now. I think the only users who would get enough value to justify the pricing are those who have a portfolio composed largely of international stocks, as most screeners today lack strong international coverage (though, Zignals does a great job with this now, and it is free). Given all the new entrants to the market, I doubt this company will be able to charge these rates for very long.
Talk to Frank about Screener.co
Related posts:







